English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background FFR was initially validated against SPECT, Dobutamine Stress Echo and Exercise Testing [1]. It is now frequently used to determine the management of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. A cut-off value of 0.75 is used in clinical practice to guide revascularisation supported by long-term outcome data [2], but a ‘grey zone’ of 0.75-0.8 with uncertain clinical significance exists [3]. Advances in non-invasive imaging tests (gated SPECT and CMR) warrant a re-evaluation of FFR at intermediate stenosis severity against non-invasive imaging.

Correlation of Fractional Flow Reserve with non-invasive tests for the detection of ischaemia due to intermediate coronary artery stenosis