English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has shown a diagnostic accuracy, which is comparable to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) regarding the highgrade stenosis. The advantage of MRA is the minimal invasiveness, resulting in an increasing employment in clinical routine. However, the image quality of MRA can be hampered by artifacts due to metal implants of joints and bones after surgery.

The valency of Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with metal implants in the clinical routine