English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

CMR k-t SENSE accelerated perfusion CMR was performed on a 3 T Philips Achieva system (saturation recovery gradient echo, repetition time/echo time 3.0 ms/1.0 ms, flip angle 15°, 5× k-t SENSE acceleration, 11 interleaved training profiles, effective acceleration 3.8, spatial resolution 1.1 × 1.1 × 10 mm3, 3 slices acquired at each RR interval). Data were acquired during adenosine hyperaemia and at rest (0.05 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA). FFR was measured in all vessels with >40% severity stenosis using a pressure sensortipped wire (Volcano®). FFR < 0.75 was considered to represent a haemodynamically significant lesion. FFR was calculated as (Pd Pv)/(Pa Pv), where Pa, Pv and Pd are simultaneous aortic, right atrial and distal coronary pressures measured during an intravenous infusion of adenosine at 140 μg/kg/min. Two experienced observers blinded to the results of the angiogram visually interpreted ischemia on CMR data as relative underperfusion of a sector within a slice or relative endocardial underperfusion compared with epicardial perfusion. The performance of visual analysis of CMR to detect flow-limiting coronary stenosis on angiography was determined. Interobserver variability was calculated using the k coefficient.

journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenoses with k-t SENSE-accelerated Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 Tesla - a comparison with fractional flow reserve