English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the economic evaluation section of the protocol [1], we stated that secondary care contacts would be coded according to Healthcare Resource Group (HRG). This has not been possible as HRGs are not routinely recorded in all of the recruiting hospitals, and have proved unreliable among the hospitals that do. Deliveries will instead be coded as 'normal', 'assisted', 'elective caesarean section', or 'emergency caesarean section' according to each patient's hospital record.

bmc pregnancy and childbirth

Erratum to: The DiAMOND trial protocol: A randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section [ISRCTN84367722]