English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Our semantic knowledge is essential for unimpaired cognition, language and behavior. Previously, we have used Electroencephalography (EEG) to decode the semantic categories of animals vs tools in younger adult subjects during a covert image naming task[1]. In this work, we are extending this approach to older subjects. To date we have recorded EEG from 6 normal older controls. A set of EEG features were extracted from the time-domain at a range of temporal scales. These signal amplitude features were used as inputs to L2-penalised logistic regression classifier, after univariate Anova feature selection. Figure ​Figure11 compares the classification results of the older group (60-79yrs, mean 68) to the previous cohort of 7 younger participants (25-33yrs, mean 29). The mean accuracy for these two groups increases similarly with the number of channels used as input to the classifier, and reaches a saturation value around 75% (Figure ​(Figure1A),1A), where baseline is 50%, and an accuracy >56% is significant at α = 0.05. Using a narrow sliding window to extract features (width of 25 ms, moving in steps of 10 ms) over the period 200 ms before to 1000 ms after stimulus onset, we found that the accuracy peaks higher and earlier in the younger subjects (Figure ​(Figure1B),1B), but the contrast only approached significance with the current sample size. We also calculated the mean classification accuracy of each channel and plotted them as scalp-maps. The results show that the accuracy is higher in right frontal and occipital regions in younger subjects (Figure ​(Figure1C),1C), while the accuracy is higher in occipital, parietal and left frontal areas in older subjects (Figure ​(Figure1D1D).    Figure 1  Comparison of classification accuracy of animals vs tools between younger and older groups.

EEG study of the neural representation and classification of semantic categories of animals vs tools in young and elderly participants