English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Drosophila photoreceptors transduce light signals to voltage responses. In natural environment, light intensity can change over 10 log range, whereas the coding range of photoreceptors is only about 50 mV. Thus, to reliably represent natural light changes photoreceptors rely upon powerful adaptation. How do different molecular mechanisms of phototransduction enable light adaptation?  Insect photoreceptors are highly polarized, containing light-sensitive and light-insensitive parts of separate functions. The light-sensitive rhabdomere contains a matrix of 30,000 independent phototransduction units (microvilli), which capture and covert light energy into bursts of currents, fluxing through TRP/TRPL channels inside the microvilli. The light insensitive cell-body, which contains voltage-gated channels, then shapes up the resulting voltage responses.  Recently, we produced a two-compartmental biophysical model of a Drosophila photoreceptor [1]. Using this model we showed that the dynamic ratio of the used and unused microvilli (ultrastucture), their stochastic reactions and calcium feedbacks cause fast adaptation of the responses, while a global feedback though the membrane voltage compresses the responses to their limited size. However, this model fails to capture slow adaptive changes in the data, which could be important for adjusting the photoreceptor dynamics to changing image statistics in a more Bayesian way.  As a first step, we wish to test whether calcium could diffuse from the responding microvillus to its neighbours, affecting the speed and sensitivity of their separate reaction cascades. We call this hypothetical cross-talk between microvilli global-diffusional-calcium feedback, and ask if it could induce the slow adaptation.  To investigate this question, we extend our biophysical model of Drosophila photoreceptor to a 3D-reaction-diffusion model; taking into account the 3D diffusion of calcium. Here, the signalling molecules are loaded in a reconstructed macro-cell structure, described by a 3D tetrahedral mesh. The reaction pathways are simulated using STEPS (STochastic Engine for Pathway Simulation), based on Gillespie’s Stochastic Simulation Algorithm, extended for diffusion.

Does calcium diffusional global feedback leads to slow light adaptation in Drosophila photoreceptors? - A 3D biophysical modelling approach