English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Introduction:   The general assumption is that blood glucose (BG) and interstitial fluid glucose (IntFG) are practically the same. We aimed to determine whether the typical patient with type 2 diabetes can use IntFG to estimate BG.Description:   The study was conducted on an 83-year-old white male with type 2 diabetes. One hundred pairs of IntFG and BG observations mg/dL (n = 50 simultaneous; n = 50 with 15-minute lag) were made over a 10-day period. We used paired t tests, correlation coefficients, and linear regression to predict relationships between IntFG and BG.Results:   There were significant ( P &lt; .0001) mean differences between IntFG and BG (simultaneous: 53.8 mg/dL; 15-minute time lag: 46.4 mg/dL). There were significant ( P &lt; .0001) positive correlations between IntFG and BG (simultaneous: r = 0.641; 15-minute time lag: r = 0.712). Linear regression revealed that increased IntFG was significantly ( P &lt; .0001) associated with declines in mean predicted BG.Conclusion:   The typical type 2 diabetes patient cannot use IntFG level to estimate BG.

Can Type 2 Diabetes Sufferers Actually Estimate Serum Glucose Level From Interstitial Fluid Glucose Level: A Diabetes Patient’s Experience