English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: The use of a washer to supplement screw fixation can prevent fragmentation and penetration during the surgical treatment of medial epicondyle fractures. However, concerns may arise regarding screw prominence and the need for subsequent implant removal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of washer utilization on the need for hardware removal and elbow range of motion (ROM). Methods: All surgically-treated pediatric medial epicondyle fractures over a 7-year period were queried for this retrospective case-control study. Patients were only included if their fracture was fixed with a single screw with or without a washer. Per institutional protocol, implants were not routinely removed after fracture healing. Hardware removal was performed only if the patient experienced a complication or implant-related symptoms that were refractory to non-operative management. Full ROM was considered flexion beyond 130 degrees and less than a 10-degree loss of extension. Univariate analysis was followed by creation of Kaplan-Meier (one minus survival) curves in order to analyze the time until full ROM was regained after surgery. Curves between patients with and without a washer were compared with a log rank test. Results: Of the 137 patients included in the study, the mean age was 12.2±2.3 years and 85 (62%) were male. A total of 31 (23%) patients ultimately underwent hardware removal. A washer was utilized in 90 (66%) cases overall. There was not an increased need for subsequent implant removal in these patients compared to those that underwent screw fixation alone (p=0.11). The mean BMI of patients that underwent hardware removal (19.1±2.5) was similar to that of children who did not (20.4±3.5, p=0.06). When analyzing a subgroup of 102 athletes only, there was similarly no difference in the rate of implant removal if a washer was used (p=0.64). Overall, 107 (78%) patients regained full ROM at a mean of 13.9±9.7 weeks after surgery (Figure 1). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportions of patients with and without a washer that achieved full ROM (p=0.46). Full ROM was achieved at a mean of 14.1±11.0 weeks in those with a washer compared to 13.6±6.2 weeks in those without one (p=0.21). Conclusions: Use of a washer did not affect the need for subsequent implant removal or elbow ROM after fixation of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures, even in thinner patients or competitive athletes. If there is concern for fracture fragmentation or penetration, a washer can be included without concern that future unplanned surgeries may be required.

USE OF A WASHER DOES NOT AFFECT THE RATE OF IMPLANT REMOVAL OR ELBOW MOTION AFTER FIXATION OF MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES