English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: SLAP tears and tendonitis disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) remain a challenge to treat in an active population. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the surgical outcomes of a primary biceps tenodesis for SLAP tears and biceps tenosynovitis in a young active population. Methods: Over a 6-year period, 125 patients with mean age of 42.6 (range, 26.3 to 56.5) with a diagnosis of LHBT were prospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria included patients with a clinical diagnosis of a type II SLAP or anterior shoulder pain who failed conservative management and underwent a diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy. Patients were excluded for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, AC joint pathology, and labral pathology outside of the SLAP lesion. Patients with an arthroscopically confirmed labral tear or biceps tendonopathy underwent a mini-open subpectoral tenodesis with interference screw and were independently evaluated with patient reported outcome measurements (SANE, WORC), and a biceps position examination. Statistical analysis was via Student’s t-test and significance set at p <.05. Results: 101 of 125 patients (81%) completed the study requirements at a mean of 2.75 years (range 1.5 to 5.7 years). 50 Patients were diagnosed with SLAP II tears (40%) and 75 patients with biceps tendonitis (60%), 28 (22%) underwent a rotator cuff debridement for a concomitant low-grade partial rotator cuff tear and LHBT instability. There was a clinically and statistical improvement in patient outcomes scores: (WORC=54%, SANE=58) improved to (WORC=89%, SANE=89.5, p<0.01). 82% of patients returned to work and full activity at a mean of 4.1 months. The biceps muscle measured relative to the antecubital fossa of operative (mean 3.20 cm) versus non-operative (3.11 cm) was not clinically different (p=0.57), except in the 3 that failed tenodesis fixation. There was an 8% complication rate: 3 patients sustained failure of the LHBT tenodesis requiring revision; 2 superficial infections treated with antibiotics; and 3 transient musculoskeletal neruopraxias. Conclusion: A primary biceps tenodesis for pathology of the LHBT provides a clinical and statistically significant improvement in shoulder outcomes with a reliable and efficient return to previous activity level and low risk for surgical complications. However, additional work is necessary to define optimal primary treatment of LHB disorders.

Outcomes of Primary Biceps Sub-pectoral Tenodesis in an Active Population: A prospective Evaluation of 101 Patients