English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background:   Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal.Objectives:   This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening.Data Sources:   Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018.Eligibility Criteria:   Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening.Data Extraction:   We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM.Data Synthesis:   Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level.Limitations:   Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator.Conclusions:   Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.

Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature