English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The past years witnessed many publications on the roles oftransnational expert networks in defining new professional fields and lobbying forsocial reform in the first half of the 20th century. The modern spatial planningprofession, still in a stage of formation then, featured prominently in thistransnational infrastructure. Pierre Yves Saunier has dubbed this international spherethe “Urban Internationale.” The participating planners devoted themselves to town andcountry planning. Rural historians so far have not discovered the potential of thetransnational planning societies in the Urban Internationale as a source to studytransnational country planning dialogue. Urban historians who have discovered thesesocieties usually focus on urban planning models and neglect the planning of thecountryside. This article uses the international congresses of the InternationalFederation for Housing and Town Planning (IFHTP) to analyze transnational countryplanning dialogue in interwar Europe. This London-based association sustained one of thelargest transnational platforms for transnational planning dialogue between thewars

Cross-Border Country Planning Dialogue in Interwar Europe