English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Participants read a procedural text describing how to make awind-up spool toy while only reading, reading and watching the experimenter do the task,or reading and doing the task themselves. Afterward, task performance (measured by timeto complete the task without the instructions and number of errors) and memoryfor/understanding of the text (measured with a Multiple Choice Test) were assessed.Participants then completed a packet that included the Need for Cognition and BoredomProneness scales. Task performance was better under the Read & Do and Read &Watch conditions, indicating that those participants were more engaged in the task thanRead Only. Need for Cognition was positively related to Multiple Choice Test score(after controlling for boredom proneness and task experience) only under the Read &Do conditions (and marginally for Read & Watch). This suggests that level of taskengagement may moderate the relationship between need for cognition and testperformance. The Boredom Proneness subscales of Perception of Time and AffectiveResponses were negatively related to need for cognition

The Relationships Between Need for Cognition, Boredom Proneness, Task Engagement, and Test Performance