z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Achieving Better Educational Practices Through Research Evidence: A Critical Analysis and Case Illustration of Benefits and Challenges
Author(s) -
Steven M. Ross,
Jennifer Morrison
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ecnu review of education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2632-1742
pISSN - 2096-5311
DOI - 10.1177/2096531120916742
Subject(s) - originality , formative assessment , accountability , value (mathematics) , psychological intervention , product (mathematics) , quality (philosophy) , evidence based practice , sustainability , public relations , psychology , business , political science , computer science , pedagogy , medicine , creativity , social psychology , ecology , philosophy , biology , machine learning , law , geometry , epistemology , psychiatry , mathematics , pathology , alternative medicine
Purpose: We examine considerations regarding the positive contributions of evidence accountability and challenges that frustrate educators in gaining access to the needed product information.Design/Approach/Methods: We review the research literature on the multiple characteristics of evidence relative to consumer (practitioner) interests. We then examine, through a “case illustration” of an initiative in a large school district, a second challenge for evidence usage—conducting viable studies and interpreting outcomes from comprehensive interventions in complex educational systems.Findings: Despite attention being given to rigorous evidence, consumers report preferring peer recommendations and local pilot studies as sources. In our case illustration, we found that the availability of evidence from comprehensive formative evaluation studies was viewed by stakeholders as positively contributing to program implementation quality and sustainability over time.Originality/Value: We use a real-world “case illustration” of a complex initiative in a large, diverse school district to illustrate how current policies and expectations regarding evidence support for educational programs is filtered through multiple agendas and personal needs of key stakeholders. Consequently, evaluators acquire nontraditional roles that go beyond routine execution of rigorous studies. Given these factors, we offer recommendations for fostering more meaningful and objective interpretations and usage of evidence by local stakeholders.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom