Did State Responses to Automation Matter for Voters?
Author(s) -
Gingrich Jane
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
research and politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.232
H-Index - 20
ISSN - 2053-1680
DOI - 10.1177/2053168019832745
Subject(s) - mainstream , compensation (psychology) , voting , state (computer science) , technological change , labour economics , economics , industrialisation , political science , political economy , public economics , demographic economics , politics , market economy , macroeconomics , law , social psychology , psychology , computer science , algorithm
This paper asks whether early responses to de-industrialization and automation shaped how those affected negatively by technological change responded politically. It begins by examining patterns of compensation, outlining cross-national differences in the use of passive early retirement benefits, the expansion of public services, and regulation of the labor market. It then pools 20 waves of the International Social Survey Programme, and examines party choices across groups of workers. It finds that those exposed to technological change are both more likely to vote for the mainstream left and right populists. Differences in compensation have a limited direct or indirect effect. Where spending and labor market regulation does matter, it heightens both left and right-populist voting among affected groups.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom