z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Practical differences between luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: perspectives across the spectrum of care
Author(s) -
Davide Meani,
Mladen Solarić,
Harri Visapää,
Rose-Marie Rosén,
Robert Janknegt,
Majana Soče
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
therapeutic advances in urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.115
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1756-2880
pISSN - 1756-2872
DOI - 10.1177/1756287217738985
Subject(s) - medicine , leuprorelin , prostate cancer , tolerability , goserelin , hormone therapy , androgen deprivation therapy , dosing , health care , oncology , medical prescription , cancer , intensive care medicine , gynecology , urology , hormone , luteinizing hormone , pharmacology , breast cancer , gonadotropin releasing hormone , adverse effect , economic growth , economics
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists is well established for the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer. As clear differences in efficacy, safety, or tolerability between the available LHRH agonists are lacking, the healthcare management team needs to look to practical differences between the formulations when selecting therapy for their patients. Moreover, as the economic burden of prostate cancer rises alongside earlier diagnosis and improved survival, the possibility for cost savings by using products with specific features is growing in importance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom