z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reflective interventionist conversation analysis
Author(s) -
O’Reilly Michelle,
Kiyimba Nikki,
Nina Lester Jessica,
Muskett Tom
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
discourse and communication
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1750-4821
pISSN - 1750-4813
DOI - 10.1177/1750481320939710
Subject(s) - conversation , argument (complex analysis) , rhetoric , conversation analysis , epistemology , style (visual arts) , sociology , reflective practice , psychology , public relations , engineering ethics , pedagogy , political science , linguistics , medicine , philosophy , engineering , archaeology , history , communication
A distinction has been drawn between basic (pure) conversation analysis (CA) and applied CA. Applied CA has become especially beneficial for informing areas of practice such as health, social care and education, and is an accepted form of research evidence in the scientific rhetoric. There are different ways of undertaking applied CA, with different foci and goals. In this article, we articulate one way of conducting applied CA, that is especially pertinent for practitioners working in different fields. We conceptualise this as Reflective Interventionist CA (RICA). We argue that this approach to applied CA is important because of its emphasis on the reflective stance that is valuable to an understanding of research data, its commitment to collaboration with practitioners, and its inductive style. In this paper, we outline the core premises and benefits of this approach and offer empirical examples to support our argument. To conclude, we consider the implications for evidence-based practice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom