English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment\udtechniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy-\udchometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures.\udResponses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and\udcall for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory

The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories