Measuring the Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Agents

Considerable progress has been made recently in developing effective antiretroviral combination therapy that can suppress viral replication and delay disease progression in individuals infected with HIV. A range of up to 15 approved antiretroviral agents is now available, which target two different viral enzymes, while several agents are in clinical development. The rapid development and approval of antiretroviral agents, driven by the urgency of clinical need as well as the complexity of possible combinations, has precluded the extensive comparative clinical testing of regimens, which is necessary to establish the relative efficacy of various different agents. The lack of an appropriate animal model for HIV disease also increases reliance on in vitro measures. Several different in vitro and in vivo parameters have been defined in an attempt to quantify the effectiveness of antiretroviral agents, most importantly the 50% inhibitory and effective concentrations (IC 50 and EC 50 ). However, the clinical relevance of these measures is uncertain. Additionally, considerable variation exists in the usage of the terms ‘IC 50 ’ and ‘EC 50 ’ in recent publications in the literature. These issues pose interpretation problems to clinicians seeking information on the relative clinical efficacy of the agents. In this brief review, we attempt to clarify the different measures available and their potential utility for clinical decision-making, focusing particularly on the example of HIV protease inhibitors. There are many different quantifiable parameters that give information regarding the effectiveness of an antiviral drug. These include: inhibition of the viral target enzyme (inhibition constant, K i ); selectivity for viral versus host enzymes; inhibition of viral replication in cell culture (IC 50 ); ratio of efficacy to cytotoxicity in vitro (therapeutic index); inhibition of viral replication or symptoms in an appropriate animal model of the disease (EC 50 ); and the effect on surrogate markers, such as viral load or CD4 cell count, after administration to humans ( in vivo EC 50 ). Each of these different parameters gives valid information about the properties of an antiretroviral agent, which can help to build up a picture of its potential clinical utility relative to other drugs. However, to gain meaningful results, it is important to apply this information intelligently, understanding the limitations of each parameter.