Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
Author(s) -
Ito Shigenori,
Kinoshita Kanako,
Endo Akiko,
Nakamura Masato
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical medicine insights: cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.634
H-Index - 21
ISSN - 1179-5468
DOI - 10.1177/1179546819838232
Subject(s) - intraclass correlation , nuclear medicine , mathematics , medicine , coefficient of variation , correlation coefficient , frame (networking) , coronary angiography , correlation , statistics , cardiology , reproducibility , computer science , geometry , telecommunications , myocardial infarction
We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography(QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected inadvance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed byassignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twicewith a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- andinterobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter(MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), andlesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculatedbased on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026(1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selectedframe QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271(31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050(2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frameQCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient ofInt R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlationcoefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved toalmost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra-and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regressionanalysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD,%DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration inclinical use.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom