English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective:   We investigated the clinical value of the Controlling Nutritional Status score in evaluating the prognosis of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Methods:   We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 88 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor or partial cystectomy between January 2011 and May 2015 in a single center. The patients were divided into groups base on high (&gt;1) and low (≤1) Controlling Nutritional Status score.Results:   Clinical and demographic data of the patient groups were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to generate survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model. Among the participants, the male-to-female ratio was 70:18 and median age was 64.5 years (range, 25-84 years). The numbers of patients with Controlling Nutritional Status score of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were 26 (29.55%), 21 (23.86%), 20 (22.73%), 12 (13.64%), 5 (5.68%), 1 (1.14%), and 3 (3.41%), respectively. The 5-year recurrence rate was 29 out of 88 patients (32.95%). The recurrence-free survival of the high-score group was significantly lower than that of the low-score group ( P &lt; 0.001). On univariate analysis, age, smoking history, Controlling Nutritional Status score, depth of tumor invasion, pathological grade, and tumor diameter were related to the prognosis of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. On multivariate analysis, the Controlling Nutritional Status score (hazard ratio, 4.938; 95% confidence interval, 1.392-17.525; P = 0.013) was an independent factor affecting the recurrence-free survival of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Conclusion:   Therefore, the Controlling Nutritional Status score could be a simple, cost-effective, and reliable predictor of prognoses among of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Controlling Nutritional Status Score Evaluates Prognosis in Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer