English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

In the wake of what has become known as the Laval quartet – the four ECJ rulings in Laval, Viking, Rüffert and Luxembourg – many analyses have been concerned with the implications for Nordic labour markets. The Laval quartet have made scholars question the sustainability of the Nordic industrial relations model and even point to its erosion (see, for example, Sippola, 2012; Thörnqvist, 2011; Woolfson et al., 2010). Many of these analyses refer to the case of Sweden, however, where the situation seems particularly uncertain. In Denmark, the industrial relations system seems to be undergoing a recalibration, rather than erosion, following the Laval quartet, as a result of judicial and political adjustments in which the position of labour market organizations remains strong.

Adjusting the Danish industrial relations system after Laval: recalibration rather than erosion