English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper proposes a framework to analyze the varying understanding of democratic developments. Based on the theory of frame-analysis, it distinguishes six brackets within which democratic developments can be interpreted, namely on the side of the electorate, the limitations of suffrage and capabilities of the electorate; taking the election process, fairness of elections and the restraints elections pose on government; and regarding elected officials, their promotion of liberal democracy and of social democracy. This framework is applied to understand the nature of international rankings of local democracy and to compare the varying framing of developments in Polish democracy in reports from international organizations and in newspaper articles comparing those in Sweden and Poland. The conclusion is that democratic developments do indeed vary enormously and that this explains the difference in assessments of, among others, the democratic developments in Poland.

Bracketing Democracy: A Comparison of Frames Used to Demarcate Democracy and Its Application to Developments in Poland