Technical Violations, Treatment and Punishment Responses, and Recidivism of Women on Probation and Parole
Author(s) -
Merry Morash,
Deborah A. Kashy,
Sandi W. Smith,
Jennifer Cobbina
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
criminal justice policy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.993
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1552-3586
pISSN - 0887-4034
DOI - 10.1177/0887403417723425
Subject(s) - recidivism , punitive damages , punishment (psychology) , psychology , clinical psychology , social psychology , political science , law
There is much debate about the effects of punitive or treatment responses to the many women who are on probation and parole. This article examines whether types of technical violations (drug or nondrug related) and responses to them (treatment or punishment oriented) as well as supervision intensity predict recidivism. Study participants are 385 women on probation or parole for a felony offense, and official records of violations and recidivism are the data source. Negative binomial regression analysis revealed that for high-risk women, treatment responses to nondrug violations are related to reductions in recidivism, whereas punitive responses to nondrug offenses are related to increased recidivism. For low-risk women, treatment responses to non-drug-related violations are related to increased recidivism and punitive responses to violations unrelated to drug use are related to decreased recidivism. Study findings suggest differential reactions to common supervision practices depending on a woman’s initial risk to recidivate.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom