z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quality of Life Impacts of Bright Light Treatment, Fluoxetine, and the Combination in Patients with Nonseasonal Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Author(s) -
Emma Morton,
Erin E. Michalak,
Anthony Levitt,
Robert D. Levitan,
Amy Cheung,
Rachel Morehouse,
Rajamannar Ramasubbu,
Lakshmi N. Yatham,
Edwin M. Tam,
Raymond W. Lam
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the canadian journal of psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.68
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1497-0015
pISSN - 0706-7437
DOI - 10.1177/0706743720936470
Subject(s) - quality of life (healthcare) , major depressive disorder , fluoxetine , placebo , randomized controlled trial , medicine , antidepressant , depressive symptoms , multilevel model , sertraline , depression (economics) , clinical trial , clinical psychology , psychiatry , psychology , cognition , anxiety , alternative medicine , serotonin , pathology , computer science , machine learning , economics , macroeconomics , nursing , receptor
Objective: Bright light therapy is increasingly recommended (alone or in combination with antidepressant medication) to treat symptoms of nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about its impacts on quality of life (QoL), a holistic, patient-valued outcome.Methods: This study utilizes secondary outcome data from an 8-week randomized, controlled, double blind trial comparing light monotherapy ( n = 32), fluoxetine monotherapy ( n = 30), and the combination of these ( n = 27) to placebo ( n = 30). QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Treatment-related differences in QoL improvements were assessed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. The influence of potential predictors of QoL (demographic variables and change in depressive symptoms) were investigated via hierarchical linear regression.Results: Q-LES-Q-SF scores significantly improved across all treatment conditions; however, no significant differences were observed between treatment arms. QoL remained poor relative to community norms by the end of the trial period: Across conditions, 70.6% of participants had significantly impaired QoL at the 8-week assessment. Reduction in depressive scores was a significant predictor of improved QoL, with the final model accounting for 54% of variance in QoL change scores.Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize that improvement in QoL and reduction in depressive symptoms in MDD, while related, cannot be taken to be synonymous. Adjunctive therapies may be required to address unmet QoL needs in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant or light therapies. Further research is required to explore additional predictors of QoL in order to better refine treatments for MDD.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom