z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On the Role of Capital in “Capitalist” and in Labor-Managed Firms
Author(s) -
David Ellerman
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
review of radical political economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.46
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1552-8502
pISSN - 0486-6134
DOI - 10.1177/0486613406296895
Subject(s) - property rights , capital (architecture) , fallacy , market economy , economics , law and economics , plaintiff , mythology , neoclassical economics , business , labour economics , economic system , microeconomics , law , political science , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , history , theology
This article outlines the “fundamental myth” about the structure of property rights in a capitalist economy, namely the idea that being the residual claimant in a productive opportunity is part of a bundle of property rights known as the “ownership of the firm.” Residual claimancy is contractually determined so there is no such “ownership.” The fundamental myth exposes a basic fallacy in capital theory that has hitherto escaped attention in the capital theory debates.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom