English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Within superficial trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) (laminae I/II), meningeal primary afferents project exclusively to lamina I, whereas nociceptive cutaneous ones distribute in both lamina I and outer lamina II. Whether such a relative absence of meningeal inputs to lamina II represents a fundamental difference from cutaneous pathways in the central processing of sensory information is still unknown. Methods We recorded extracellular field potentials in the superficial Sp5C of anesthetised rats evoked by electrically stimulating the dura mater, to selectively assess the synaptic transmission between meningeal primary afferents and second-order Sp5C neurons, the first synapse in trigeminovascular pathways. We tested the effect of systemic morphine and local glycinergic and GABA A ergic disinhibition. Results Meningeal stimulation evokes two negative field potentials in superficial Sp5C. The conduction velocities of the activated primary afferents are within the Aδ- and C-fibre ranges. Systemic morphine specifically suppresses meningeal C-fibre-evoked field potentials, and this effect is reversed by systemic naloxone. Segmental glycinergic or GABA A ergic disinhibition strongly potentiates meningeal C-fibre-evoked field potentials but not Aδ-fibre ones. Interestingly, the same segmental disinhibition conversely potentiates cutaneous Aδ-fibre-evoked field potentials and suppresses C-fibre ones. Conclusion These findings reveal that the different anatomical organization of meningeal and cutaneous inputs into superficial Sp5C is associated with a different central processing of meningeal and cutaneous pain information within Sp5C. Moreover, they suggest that the potentiation upon local disinhibition of the first synapse in trigeminovascular pathways may contribute to the generation of headache pain.

Different processing of meningeal and cutaneous pain information in the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis