English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this randomized, open study, we compared the incidence of lower limb motor block associated with epidural labour analgesia provided by parturient-controlled method (PCEA) with continuous infusion (CIEA) using 0.2% ropivacaine. The PCEA group (n = 20) received a demand-only regimen (bolus 5 ml, lockout 15 minutes). The rate of infusion of the CIEA group (n = 20) was 8 ml/h. We found that pain relief was not significantly different between the two groups, although the PCEA group had a higher satisfaction score (P &lt; 0.05). Fewer parturients in the PCEA group had lower limb motor block (6 vs 14, P &lt; 0.05). The total volume of ropivacaine used per hour was also lower in the PCEA group (median 8.75 vs 10.5 ml, P &lt; 0.05). No difference in the maternal or fetal outcome was detected. We conclude that PCEA with ropivacaine is an effective mode of analgesia which is dose-sparing and produces less motor block in comparison with CIEA.

Epidural 0.2% Ropivacaine for Labour Analgesia: Parturient-Controlled or Continuous Infusion?