English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The inspiratory work (WI) imposed by three commonly used demand valve ventilator circuits was studied using a lung model to simulate spontaneous ventilation. The CPU-1 and Engstrom Erica circuits recorded WI of 379 mJ/l and 190 mJ/l respectively. A negative WI of -32 mJ/l was recorded for the Servo 900C, denoting that the circuit performed work on the lung. The demand valves recorded a time delay between inspiratory effort and onset of gas flow, of 300 ms (CPU-1), 190 ms (Servo 900c) and 160 ms (Engstrom Erica). Both the Servo 900C and Engstrom Erica demand valves were able to generate a high inspiratory gas flow response, but the CPU-1 lacked such a flow compensation. Expiratory work was also greatest with the CPU-1 (156 mJ/l) with 141 mJ/l and 90 mJ/l recorded for the Servo 900C and Engstrom Erica. Of the three ventilators studied, the Servo 900C appears to be the ventilator circuit of choice for spontaneous ventilation.

Inspiratory Work Imposed by Demand Valve Ventilator Circuits