z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Back to the inverted-U for music preference: A review of the literature
Author(s) -
Anthony Chmiel,
Emery Schubert
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
psychology of music
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.983
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1741-3087
pISSN - 0305-7356
DOI - 10.1177/0305735617697507
Subject(s) - psychology , preference , denial , social psychology , cognitive psychology , psychoanalysis , microeconomics , economics
© The Author(s) 2017. This study investigated the inverted-U model of preference for music as a function of collative variables (especially familiarity and complexity) over the last 115 years. The results of 57 studies on music preference were categorized according to their patterns of preference. Fifty of the 57 studies (87.7%) were categorized as compatible with an overarching (segmented) inverted-U model, while the results of five studies (8.8%) were interpreted as mixed, showing both compatible and incompatible results. Two studies (3.5%) were categorized as completely incompatible with the model. In contrast to authors who describe the model as defunct, this review has observed that studies producing results compatible with the inverted-U are still prevalent. We propose that while there may be inconsistencies with Berlyne's psychobiological theory from a scientific, arousal-based standpoint, the inverted-U model is able to explain a considerable amount of data. Rather, it seems that research interests have moved elsewhere, but caution is urged in asserting denial or dismissal of the relationship in music preference research

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom