Decolonising the political theory curriculum
Author(s) -
Simon Choat
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.855
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1467-9256
pISSN - 0263-3957
DOI - 10.1177/0263395720957543
Subject(s) - curriculum , politics , rewriting , white (mutation) , sociology , neglect , colonialism , ethnic studies , ethnic group , political philosophy , critical race theory , race (biology) , gender studies , pedagogy , political science , psychology , law , anthropology , programming language , biochemistry , chemistry , gene , psychiatry , computer science
Recent calls to ‘decolonise the curriculum’ are especially pertinent to the teaching of political theory, which has traditionally been dominated by a canon made up overwhelmingly of White (and male) thinkers. This article explores why and how political theory curricula might be decolonised. By mapping core political theory modules provided at UK universities, and examining associated textbooks, the article shows that non-White thinkers and discussions of colonialism and race are marginalised and neglected. It then argues that there are intellectual, political, and pedagogical reasons why this neglect is problematic and should be reversed. Finally, the article reflects on the experience of rewriting and delivering a core second-year undergraduate modern political thought module at a post-92 London university, including assessing the impact of the changes on the attainment gap between White students and Black and minority ethnic students.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom