z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Thinking the future of work through the history of right to work claims
Author(s) -
Pablo Scotto Benito
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
philosophy and social criticism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1461-734X
pISSN - 0191-4537
DOI - 10.1177/0191453719860220
Subject(s) - work (physics) , notice , meaning (existential) , democracy , sociology , interpretation (philosophy) , right to work , face (sociological concept) , hegemony , right to know , law and economics , epistemology , wage , law , political economy , public relations , political science , positive economics , social science , economics , engineering , philosophy , politics , mechanical engineering , linguistics
The wide presence of the right to work in national and international legal texts contrasts with a lack of agreement about the concrete content of this right. According to the hegemonic interpretation, it consists of two elements: (a) extension of wage labour and (b) significant improvement of working conditions. However, if we study the history of right to work claims, especially from the French Revolution to 1848, we can notice that the meaning of this right was rather wider in the past. Rescuing the historical significance of the right to work may help to face the problem of the future of work. In particular, and unlike what might seem at first sight, the claim that everyone should have his or her right to work guaranteed can be a way of articulating and concretizing issues such as workplace democracy, the organization of domestic work or the transition to a sustainable society.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom