English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Research has demonstrated that people can and oftendo consciously manipulate scores on personality tests.Test constructors have responded by using social desirabilityand lying scales in order to identify dishonest respondents.Unfortunately, these approaches have hadlimited success. This study evaluated the use of appropriatenessmeasurement for identifying dishonest respondents.A dataset was analyzed in which respondents wereinstructed either to answer honestly or to fake good. Theitem response theory approach classified a higher numberof faking respondents at low rates of misclassification ofhonest respondents (false positives) than did a social desirabilityscale. At higher false positive rates, the socialdesirability approach did slightly better. Implications foroperational testing and suggestions for further researchare provided. Index terms: appropriateness measurement,detecting faking, item response theory, lying scales,person fit, personality measurement

Detecting Faking on a Personality Instrument Using Appropriateness Measurement