z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure
Author(s) -
Scanlan Jessica M.,
Yesberg Julia A.,
Fortune Clare-Ann,
Polaschek Devon L. L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
criminal justice and behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.298
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1552-3594
pISSN - 0093-8548
DOI - 10.1177/0093854819896387
Subject(s) - recidivism , predictive validity , risk assessment , psychology , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , incremental validity , suicide prevention , premise , injury prevention , sex offender , risk management tools , clinical psychology , test validity , social psychology , psychometrics , medicine , computer security , medical emergency , computer science , linguistics , philosophy
Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral risk assessment tool—the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR)—with matched samples of women and men serving community supervision sentences. Total DRAOR scores had comparative predictive validity across gender. For women and men, the DRAOR predicted reconviction over a static risk measure. The findings support the general premise of gender neutrality, but do not necessarily suggest the DRAOR, or gender-neutral tools more broadly, are the best tools for use with women.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom