z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Protesting iconic megaprojects. A discourse network analysis of the evolution of the conflict over Stuttgart 21
Author(s) -
Melanie Nagel,
Keiichi Satoh
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
urban studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.922
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1360-063X
pISSN - 0042-0980
DOI - 10.1177/0042098018775903
Subject(s) - politics , sociology , sign (mathematics) , corporate governance , democracy , civil society , state (computer science) , political economy , discourse analysis , political science , public administration , law , economics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , finance , algorithm , computer science , linguistics , philosophy
The past decades witnessed enormous transformations in the built environment of cities, and one of these trends is the development of iconic megaprojects. Public protests against these projects occur frequently, and scholars in urban governance have diagnosed this as an emerging ‘post-political’ condition, that is, as a sign of a deficient democratic politics. Others criticise this kind of reasoning as a ‘post-political-trap’ (Beveridge and Koch, 2017), and demand more research. This article responds to this debate with an empirical study of the popular protests against the infrastructural public transport project Stuttgart 21 in Germany. We apply discourse network analysis to investigate the evolution of the discourse, illuminate multiple dynamic connections between issues and actors, and apply factor analysis to identify the key issues of the conflict. Our study complicates and qualifies the arguments for a ‘post-political’ state of urban politics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom