Catholic Theology in the Thirteenth Century and the Origins of Secularism
Author(s) -
Rik Van Nieuwenhove
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
irish theological quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 1752-4989
pISSN - 0021-1400
DOI - 10.1177/0021140010377735
Subject(s) - voluntarism (philosophy) , faith , nominalism , scholarship , secularism , context (archaeology) , philosophy , theology , sociology , epistemology , political science , law , history , archaeology , islam
This article examines two distinct responses to the reception of Aristotle in the thirteenth century: the Bonaventurean and the Thomist. The outcome of this debate (and the Condemnations of 1277) led to the modern separation of faith and reason. Rather than seeing voluntarism and nominalism as the cause of the modern separation of faith and reason, and theology and philosophy, it will be suggested that it is actually the other way around: the Bonaventurean response indirectly resulted in the growing separation of faith and reason, which led, in turn, to voluntarism. It is important not to confuse the Thomist and Franciscan responses, as sometimes happens in recent scholarship, including in the work of Gavin D’Costa, as will be shown. Both the Thomist and the Bonaventurean approaches are legitimate resources to respond to the (post)-secular context in which we find ourselves, and the former should not be reduced to the latter.Ye
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom