How Do Employers Choose between Types of Contingent Work? Costs, Control, and Institutional Toying
Author(s) -
Chiara Benassi,
Andreas Kornelakis
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
industrial and labor relations review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.927
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 2162-271X
pISSN - 0019-7939
DOI - 10.1177/0019793920944910
Subject(s) - variety (cybernetics) , control (management) , diversity (politics) , work (physics) , german , business , industrial organization , economics , public economics , microeconomics , sociology , management , computer science , archaeology , artificial intelligence , history , mechanical engineering , anthropology , engineering
The increasing variety of contingent work raises the question of how employers choose between various types of contractual arrangements. The authors review relevant Employment Relations and Strategic HRM literature and distinguish four types of contingent contracts along the dimensions of costs and control. They argue that employers are making choices based on cost and control constraints but are able to reshape these constraints through “institutional toying.” Their case study of a German manufacturing plant and R&D center illustrates the mechanisms of institutional toying, which are consistent with the literature on institutional loopholes and exit options. The article develops propositions that explain the diversity of contingent work arrangements and show how toying strategies enlarge the range of options available to employers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom