z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models
Author(s) -
Goran Pavlov,
Alberto MaydeuOlivares,
Dexin Shi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
educational and psychological measurement
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.819
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1552-3888
pISSN - 0013-1644
DOI - 10.1177/0013164420926231
Subject(s) - mathematics , statistics , kurtosis , standard deviation , sample size determination , residual , skewness , normality test , mean squared error , standard error , statistical hypothesis testing , algorithm
We examine the accuracy of p values obtained using the asymptotic mean and variance (MV) correction to the distribution of the sample standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) proposed by Maydeu-Olivares to assess the exact fit of SEM models. In a simulation study, we found that under normality, the MV-corrected SRMR statistic provides reasonably accurate Type I errors even in small samples and for large models, clearly outperforming the current standard, that is, the likelihood ratio (LR) test. When data shows excess kurtosis, MV-corrected SRMR p values are only accurate in small models ( p = 10), or in medium-sized models ( p = 30) if no skewness is present and sample sizes are at least 500. Overall, when data are not normal, the MV-corrected LR test seems to outperform the MV-corrected SRMR. We elaborate on these findings by showing that the asymptotic approximation to the mean of the SRMR sampling distribution is quite accurate, while the asymptotic approximation to the standard deviation is not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom