English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Lagrange multiplier (LM) or score tests have seen renewed interest for the purpose of diagnosing misspecification in item response theory (IRT) models. LM tests can also be used to test whether parameters differ from a fixed value. We argue that the utility of LM tests depends on both the method used to compute the test and the degree of misspecification in the initially fitted model. We demonstrate both of these points in the context of a multidimensional IRT framework. Through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study, we examine the performance of LM tests under varying degrees of model misspecification, model size, and different information matrix approximations. A generalized LM test designed specifically for use under misspecification, which has apparently not been previously studied in an IRT framework, performed the best in our simulations. Finally, we reemphasize caution in using LM tests for model specification searches.

On Lagrange Multiplier Tests in Multidimensional Item Response Theory: Information Matrices and Model Misspecification