The Political Conditions for Local Peacemaking: A Comparative Study of Communal Conflict Resolution in Kenya
Author(s) -
Elfversson Emma
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
comparative political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.017
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1552-3829
pISSN - 0010-4140
DOI - 10.1177/0010414019830734
Subject(s) - peacemaking , politics , conflict resolution , government (linguistics) , sectarianism , political science , argument (complex analysis) , political economy , ethnic conflict , social psychology , economics , law , psychology , biochemistry , philosophy , linguistics , chemistry
How does government bias affect prospects for peace agreements in communal conflicts? Government bias has been shown to have a strong impact on the incidence and dynamics of localized ethnic conflict, but the way that it affects conflict resolution remains underexplored. I argue that government bias makes the conflict parties less likely to overcome the commitment problem, because they cannot trust the government’s willingness to guarantee or uphold any agreement they reach. Consequently, bias reduces the chances that the parties are able to reach a peace agreement. A systematic comparison of four cases in Kenya provides support for this argument. I also distinguish between bias related to strategic interest and bias related to relationships, and find that the former is more durable, whereas the latter is more likely to be influenced by political turnover, thereby opening up possibilities for peacemaking.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom