English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The presence of therapy manuals in clinical settings is increasing and the related concepts of adherence and competence are becoming familiar. The benefits of manuals for research and training are evident. However, negative clinical effects have also been reported. Dynamically oriented clinicians and researchers who use manuals face a dilemma. Although there is a need to control aspects of technique for research and training purposes, there is also a need not to control the process of therapy because unpredictability is an intended part of the process. Issues associated with the dilemma are reviewed and a possible solution is provided that has proven helpful in an active clinic and research setting. It involves the use of manuals that emphasize general guidelines rather than detailed technical behaviors.

Therapy Manuals and the Dilemma of Dynamically Oriented Therapists and Researchers