English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One pivotal factor affecting the accuracy of HF radar current measurements is the direction of arrival (DOA) estimation performance of the current signal. The beamforming technology or superresolution algorithm cannot always perform best in practical applications because of the phase errors existing in array channels. These phase errors, which cause uncertain estimation of DOA, lead to confused values in radial current maps. To solve this problem, this paper is focused on discussing the performances of two autocalibration methods using sea echoes for multifrequency high-frequency (MHF) radar current measurements. These two array calibration methods, based on maximum likelihood (ML) and multiple signal classification (MU), first seek single-DOA sea echoes and then gather them for array calibration using different cost functions. The ML and MU methods provide approximate mean phases, while the standard phase errors of the MU method are smaller. After array calibration using these two methods, the re...

Evaluating Two Array Autocalibration Methods with Multifrequency HF Radar Current Measurements