English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two commercial large-aperture scintillometers, Scintec BLS900, were tested on pathlengths of 1840 and 4200m at about 45–65m above ground in Helsinki, Finland. From July 2011 through June 2012, large variability in diurnal and annual cycles of both the temperature structure parameter C 2 and sensible heat flux H were observed. Scintillometer data were compared with data from two eddy-covariance stations. A robust method was developed for the calculation ofC 2 from raw sonic-anemometer data. In contrast to many earlier studies that solely present the values of H, the main focus here is on comparisons of C 2 T itself. This has advantages, because optical-wavelength scintillometers measure C 2 with few assumptions, while the determination of H implies the applicability of the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory, which has several inherent limitations.The histogramsofC2 comparewell between sonic andscintillometer. In-depthanalysis is focused on one of the scintillometer paths: both C2 T and H comparisons gave similar and surprisingly high correlation coefficients (0.85 for C2 and 0.84–0.95 for H in unstable conditions), given the differences between the two measurement techniques, substantial sensor separation, and different source areas.

On the Temperature Structure Parameter and Sensible Heat Flux over Helsinki from Sonic Anemometry and Scintillometry