English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A recent paper suggested that the global climate models used to project future climate changes may significantly overestimate the stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation under anthropogenic global warming. It further asserted that “flux adjusting” the models (adding offsets to heat and freshwater fluxes to reproduce the observed density field) may reduce model stability. However, temperature, salinity, and density fields in climate models likely deviate from observations because of biases in model physics as well as inaccuracies in fluxes. In such cases it is unclear whether adjusting the fluxes to produce a more realistic density field will result in a model with more realistic stability properties, as flux correction may be compensating for other inaccuracies in model formulation. We investigate this question using a simplified dynamical box model, in which we can flux correct one version of the model to match density gradients within another version of the model. We show that flux adjustment can realistically compensate for biases in stability associated with some processes, such as uncertainty in the value of the vertical diffusivity, but not other processes, such as inaccurate simulation of the relationship between density structure and overturning or the isopycnal tracer diffusivity coefficient. An ability to compensate for biases when the overturning shuts off does not imply an ability to compensate for biases in when it reestablishes itself, and vice versa.

Flux Correction and Overturning Stability: Insights from a Dynamical Box Model