English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Data collected from aircraft equipped with AIDS (Aircraft Integrated Data System) instrumentation during the Global Weather Experiment year of 1979 are used to estimate the observational error of winds at flight level from this and other aircraft automated wind-reporting systems. Structure functions are computed from reports that are paired using specific criteria. The value of this function extrapolated to zero separation distance is an estimate of twice the random measurement-error variance of the AIDS-measured winds. Component-wind errors computed in this way range from 2.1 to 3.1 m · s−1 for the two months of data examined, January and August 1979. Observational error, specified in optimum-interpolation analyses to allow the analysis to distinguish among observations of differing quality, is composed of both measurement error and the error of unrepresentativeness. The latter type of error is a function of the resolvable scale of the analysis-prediction system. The structure function, which measures the variability of a field as a function of separation distance, includes both of these types of error. If the resolvable scale of an analysis procedure is known, an estimate of the observational error can be computed from the structure function at that particular distance. An observational error of 5.3 m · s−1 was computed for the u and v wind components for a sample resolvable scale of 300 km. The errors computed from the structure functions are compared to colocation statistics from radiosondes. The errors associated with automated wind reports are found to compare favorably with those estimated for radiosonde winds at that level.

The Observational Error of Automated Wind Reports from Aircraft