English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Different cloud schemes are compared using the single column model (SCM) version of the general circulation model of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis. Emphasis is placed on the differences between a statistical cloud scheme and an explicit one, two approaches commonly used in GCMs. The microphysical processes are identical in both schemes so that the differences can be attributed to cloud formation and dissipation only. Two case studies are chosen, one for a day during the European Cloud and Radiation Experiment (EUCREX) and one for a day during the North Atlantic Regional Experiment (NARE). During the EUCREX case study the SCM is forced by advection from the mesoscale model GESIMA (Geesthacht Simulation Model of the Atmosphere). The comparison of ice water content as a function of height shows that the SCM cannot reproduce the observed nearly linear decrease with height as well as GESIMA does above 8.5 km. If temperature, specific humidity, and cloud ice advection are used ...

Comparing Different Cloud Schemes of a Single Column Model by Using Mesoscale Forcing and Nudging Technique