English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

CONCLUSIONS: •Global effects from spatial averaging are still robust even when stimulus and distractor are separated in time by up to 90ms, and show no evidence of declining. • Global effect is more apparent in short latency saccades, with latencies between 140ms and about 280ms. • Global effect can occur with as little as 90ms between the distractor onset and initiation of the saccade (integration time), about 40ms shorter than the estimate for second-target effects in double-step saccades. INTRODUCTION – THE GLOBAL EFFECT: • A distractor close to a target will cause saccades to deviate to a point between the two. • It is modeled as spatial averaging of neural activity generated by targets and distractors in the colliculus.

The temporal dynamics of target and distractor occurrence in the global effect of saccades