English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: Several systematic reviews for Therapeutic Effect of Kanglaite Injection Plus First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Versus First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Alone In Stage IIIB Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma have recently emerged evidence. However, limited data are available regarding the activity of available EGFR TKIs against uncommon EGFR mutations. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of Kanglaite Injection Plus First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Versus First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Alone In Stage IIIB Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma. So therefore, Lung Adenocarcinoma related diseases have a profound economic impact on health care systems global wide, thus Kanglaite Injection combined with First-Line EGFR –TKIs have been shown to have beneficial effects than treatment with First-Line EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Alone. Methods: We electronically searched the literature of the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (Chinese language, English 2010-2019), Pub Med, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails from database inception, CNKI, web of science Wang Fang, and manually searched Chinese-language oncology journals to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Kanglaite Injection Plus First Line EGFR-TKIs Versus First Line EGFR- TKIs Alone, regardless of their having been published or not, blinding, duration of treatment, or duration of follow-up. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the method recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration (CC). If heterogeneity existed among subgroups, then overall results (OS) were calculated based on a random-effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. Results: Electronic database searches yielded 1780 citations with NSCLC. Articles or Records Excluded by screening of the title/abstract level total 510, Records which are not Rcts 430, Study with no EGFR mutation analysis 590, Due to duplicated publication 180. Finally, we identified full text articles retrieved for detailled evaluation 70. The sample size of each trial had calculated by Rev Man 5.3. Pooled analyses performed using both fixed- and random-effects models revealed that compared with First Line of Egfr-Tkis alone, KLT injection plus First Line of Egfr-Tkis improved the response rate (relative risk [RR}, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.51 and RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.2 0-1.51, respectively). KLT injection plus First Line of Egfr-Tkis was associated with improvement in the symptoms of cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, and anorexia.

A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Kanglaite Injection Plus First-Line EGFRTKIs Versus First-Line EGFRTKIs Alone Stage IIIB Lung Adenocarcinoma