English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In the beloved classic of English literature Pride and Prejudice, the heroine of the story, Miss Elizabeth Bennett, woefully misunderstands Mr. Darcy’s character and motivations, wrongly believing him to be proud and disdainful following a series of rather unfortunate encounters early on in their acquaintance. As a result, opportunities very much to Miss Bennett’s advantage are nearly lost. The Canadian-EU Arctic relationship has also suffered from similar misconceptions; that is to say, from a lack of true understanding of “character, identity and motivations.” And as with Jane Austen’s tale, it may well be that Canada and the European Union have let early encounters skew their understanding and taint their vision of the other. In Canada, the European Union’s efforts to constructively engage in the Arctic have been met with scepticism and distrust. The supranational body’s actions have been characterised in some quarters as irrelevant and, in others, as intrusive. A recent post on the “Eye on the Arctic” blog coordinated by Radio Canada International by Heather Exner-Pirot, a strategist for Outreach and Indigenous Engagement at the University of Saskatchewan, is representative. “The EU keeps telling us it cares about the Arctic,” she asserts. “I’m not sure the Arctic cares about it.”1

Searching for Common Ground in Evolving Canadian and eu Arctic Strategies