English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author comments on a recent judgment by the  Corte di Cassazione  ( Sezioni Unite Civili ) touching upon particularly significant issues of private international law in matters of succession. A central issue in the judgment under review lies in the role of  renvoi  as an instrument of coordination between national conflict-of-laws systems. This is particularly critical in succession matters, in cases where the choice-of-law rules of the countries concerned are inspired by the opposite systems of unity rather than splitting of succession. Alongside  renvoi , the judgment under review touches upon other important issues of private international law, such as characterization and the requirements for a valid  optio legis  by the deceased. As the author notes, while the case, due to temporal reasons, was decided pursuant to Italian private international law rules in matters of succession, comparable results would have probably been reached based on the choice-of-law rules embodied in the European Succession Regulation No. 650/2012.

The Law Applicable to Succession, Between Unity and Splitting of the Relevant Legal Regime