English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study compares the determinants of antidumping duties with those of countervailing duties using data for the U.S. ITC under the World Trade Organization system. The empirical evidences show that the commissioners are responsive to changes in trade balances and unemployment rate. Their decisions in case of antidumping duties are revealed to be less responsive to changes in macroeconomic variables than those relating to countervailing duties. The Democrat Commissioners are revealed to be more responsive to macroeconomic variables than the Republican Commissioners in the case of countervailing duties-related decisions.

Comparison between Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: The Case of the United States International Trade Commission, 1995-1999